U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1997

Gomez v. Washoe County School Dist.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 24, 1997

133 F.3d 927; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 40456; 1997 WL 812247 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

133 F.3d 927

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Fred GOMEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; Mary Nebgen, Superintendent;
John Gascue, Assistant Superintendent; Judith Moss; Bob
Bently; Dan Coppa; Rusty Crook; Marilyn Fendelander;
Margie Broderick; Doramus Goodnight, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 96-17184.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 11, 1997.**
Dec. 24, 1997.

Before BROWNING, PREGERSON, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER*

Based on the Supreme Court's decision in Gilbert v. Homar, 117 S.Ct. 1807 (1997), the judgment of the district court, that prior notice and a hearing are required in all instances when an employee is suspended without pay, is reversed.

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 34-4 and Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.