United States v. Reginald Thomas, AKA Ernesto Hernandez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit February 20, 1998

United States v. Reginald Thomas, AKA Ernesto Hernandez, 139 F.3d 909 (9th Cir. 1998)

1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 12054; 1998 WL 75624

Opinion

139 F.3d 909

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Reginald THOMAS, aka Ernesto Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 97-50259.
D.C. No. CR-96-01001-HLH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 20, 1998.
Submitted February 9, 1998**.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Harry L. Hupp, District Judge, Presiding.

Before PREGERSON, CANBY and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

Reginald Thomas appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for providing false identification or information in the purchase of firearms from a licensed dealer. His counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

Our independent review of the record discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Reference

Status: Unpublished