Ladonovan Owens v. Daniel Lungren, Attorney General James A. Gomez, Director, Department of Corrections E.R. Meyer

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit March 13, 1998

Ladonovan Owens v. Daniel Lungren, Attorney General James A. Gomez, Director, Department of Corrections E.R. Meyer, 141 F.3d 1178 (9th Cir. 1998)

1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 14178; 1998 WL 121627

Opinion

141 F.3d 1178

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Ladonovan OWENS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Daniel LUNGREN, Attorney General; James A. Gomez, Director,
Department of Corrections; E.R. Meyer;
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 97-15761.
D.C. No. CV-92-03367-VRW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Mar. 10, 1998**.
Decided Mar. 13, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Vaughn R. Walker, Presiding.

Before FLETCHER, BEEZER, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

Ladonovan Owens, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1) motion. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in the order dated March 10, 1997

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Reference

Status: Unpublished