U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Dorothy A. Jimenez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 19, 1998

141 F.3d 1181; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 14619; 1998 WL 133223 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

141 F.3d 1181

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dorothy A. JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-50284.
D.C. No. CR-95-00901-JMI.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

.
Submitted Mar. 10, 19982.
Decided Mar. 19, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James M. Ideman, District Judge, Presiding.

Before FLETCHER, BEEZER, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM1

Dorothy Jimenez appeals her conviction following entry of a conditional guilty plea to one count of distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Jimenez's counsel has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent review of the record discloses no arguable issues for review, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.