Charas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Charas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 169 F.3d 594 (9th Cir. 1999)
99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1359; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2712; 1999 WL 86696

Charas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Appellee American Airlines filed a “Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc” due to a factual error in the Opinion. The Opinion filed in this case on November 30, 1998 is amended at Slip op. page 13310, last three lines through page 13311, line 1 [160 F.3d at 1262], as follows:

The last sentence on Slip op. page 13310 [160 F.3d at 1262] and carrying over to the next page should read: “Prior to obtaining *595the required certificate, Newman was not permitted to board and was required to stay overnight at a motel.”

With this amendment, the en banc panel votes to deny the petition for rehearing and rejects the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

Reference

Full Case Name
Cherie CHARAS v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., a Missouri corporation, Defendant-Appellee Mildred Jacoby v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., and John Doe, 1-10 Jane Doe, 1-10 Doe Corporations, 1-10 Doe Partners, 1-10 Doe Entities, 1-10, Defendants Bernice Gulley v. American Airlines AMR Corporation American Eagle Airlines, Defendants-Appellees Elizabeth Newman v. American Airlines, Inc., and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants Robert A. Beverage v. Continental Airlines, Inc.
Cited By
14 cases
Status
Published