U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1999

Lambert v. Ackerly

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 9, 1999 · Hug

169 F.3d 666; 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1750; 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 677; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4119 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Lambert v. Ackerly (9th Cir. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this ease be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Lambert v. Ackerly, 156 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 1998), is withdrawn.

. Judge McKeown was recused.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.