U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Rodrigues

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 15, 1999 · Noonan, Reinhardt, Thompson

170 F.3d 881; 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1850; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4120; 1999 WL 133275 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1850, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2451 United States of America v. Jess A. Rodrigues (9th Cir. 1999)
United States v. Tucker (9th Cir. 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed on October 28, 1998 is amended as follows:

At slip op. p. 12496, first ¶ , Ins 1-2 [159 F.3d at 449]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Stephen Sehirle” with “the prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12496, third ¶, Ins 2-3 [159 F.3d at 449]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Sehirle” with “the prosecutor”;

Same paragraph, Ins 7 & 9 [159 F.3d at 449]: Replace “Sehirle” with “the prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12497, first ¶, In 1 [159 F.3d at 449]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Wayne T. Lamprey” with “The prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12499, first ¶ , Ins 3-4 [159 F.3d at 450]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Sehirle” with “the prosecutor”;

Same paragraph, In 5 [159 F.3d at 450]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Lamprey” with “the prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12499, second ¶, Ins 4 & 7 [159 F.3d at 450]: Replace “Lamprey” with “The prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12499, third ¶, In 1 [159 F.3d at 450]: Replace “Lamprey’s” with “The prosecutor’s”.

With these amendments, the petitions for rehearing are DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.