Matsuura v. Alsto & Bird
Opinion of the Court
The opinion filed February 2, 1999 [166 F.3d 1006], is modified as follows:
Section II, second paragraph, first and second sentences [166 F.3d at 1008]: delete first sentence and add the following footnote to end of the second sentence:
[FN] DuPont makes a bare assertion in a footnote that DiSabatino was wrongly decided, but devotes its argument to distinguishing the case.
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. The request for certification and the motion for a stay of proceedings are denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- David MATSUURA, individually and dba Orchid Isle Nursery, and Stephen Matsuura, individually and dba Hawaiian Dendrobium Farm, Plaintiffs-counter v. ALSTON & BIRD, a Georgia partnership including professional corporations, and E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-counter, plaintiff-Appellee David Matsuura, individually dba Orchid Isle Nursery Stephen Matsuura, individually dba Hawaiian Dendrobium Farm v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published