Matsuura v. Alsto & Bird
Matsuura v. Alsto & Bird
179 F.3d 1131
(Federal Reporter, Third Series)
Matsuura v. Alsto & Bird
Opinion of the Court
The opinion filed February 2, 1999 [166 F.3d 1006], is modified as follows:
Section II, second paragraph, first and second sentences [166 F.3d at 1008]: delete first sentence and add the following footnote to end of the second sentence:
[FN] DuPont makes a bare assertion in a footnote that DiSabatino was wrongly decided, but devotes its argument to distinguishing the case.
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. The request for certification and the motion for a stay of proceedings are denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.