U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1999

Matsuura v. Alsto & Bird

Matsuura v. Alsto & Bird
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 2, 1999 · Browning, Goodwin, Schroeder
179 F.3d 1131 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Matsuura v. Alsto & Bird

Opinion of the Court

The opinion filed February 2, 1999 [166 F.3d 1006], is modified as follows:

Section II, second paragraph, first and second sentences [166 F.3d at 1008]: delete first sentence and add the following footnote to end of the second sentence:

[FN] DuPont makes a bare assertion in a footnote that DiSabatino was wrongly decided, but devotes its argument to distinguishing the case.

The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. The request for certification and the motion for a stay of proceedings are denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.