Defenders of Wildlife v. Browner

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit December 7, 1999

Defenders of Wildlife v. Browner, 197 F.3d 1035 (9th Cir. 1999)

99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9600; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 32020; 1999 WL 1101287

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed September 15, 1999 [191 F.3d 1159], is amended as follows:

On slip opinion page 11687, line 11 [191 F.3d at 1165]: delete “As all parties concede,” and change “§ ” to “Section”.

With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Graber has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Noonan and Thompson have so recommended.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no *1036judge of the court has requested a vote on it.

The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Reference

Full Case Name: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and The Sierra Club v. Carol M. BROWNER, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, City of Tempe, Arizona City of Tucson, Arizona City of Mesa, Arizona Pima County, Arizona and City of Phoenix, Arizona, Intervenors-Respondents
Cited By: 12 cases
Status: Published