Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2000

Lucio Flores Ortega-Appellant v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden,order

Lucio Flores Ortega-Appellant v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden,order
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 24, 2000 · Beezer, Hall, Rymer
209 F.3d 1122; 2000 Daily Journal DAR 4205; 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3105; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 7347; 2000 WL 432411 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Lucio Flores Ortega-Appellant v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden,order

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the opinion of the Supreme Court we vacate our opinion in Ortega v. Roe, 160 F.3d 534 (9th Cir. 1998). This case is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with the-opinion in Ernest C. Roe, Warden v. Lucio Flores-Ortega, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000).

The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑