Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2000

Patricia E. Gentala Robert A. Gentala, Cross v. City of Tucson Arizona-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

Patricia E. Gentala Robert A. Gentala, Cross v. City of Tucson Arizona-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 18, 2000
222 F.3d 614 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Patricia E. Gentala Robert A. Gentala, Cross v. City of Tucson Arizona-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

Opinion

222 F.3d 614 (9th Cir. 2000)

PATRICIA E. GENTALA; ROBERT A. GENTALA, Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross Appellees,
v.
CITY OF TUCSON Arizona, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

No. 97-17062, 97-17069

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FILED AUG 18, 2000

D.C. No. CV-97-00327-FRZ

Before: HUG, Chief Judge.

ORDER

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the NinthCircuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑