Adrian Salmon v. M. Carillo Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Adrian Salmon v. M. Carillo Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, 222 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2000)
2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6433; 2000 Daily Journal DAR 8515; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18348; 2000 WL 1056057
Adrian Salmon v. M. Carillo Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General
Opinion
ORDER
The order filed June 28, 2000 is amended as follows: In light of the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000), it is ORDERED that this case be remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing on Petitioner’s plea-related and appeal-related ineffectiveness of counsel claims. With this amendment, the petition for rehearing is denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Adrian SALMON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. CARILLO; Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee
- Status
- Published