U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2000

Adrian Salmon v. M. Carillo Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General

Adrian Salmon v. M. Carillo Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 2, 2000 · Skopil, Reinhardt, Graber
222 F.3d 1046; 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6433; 2000 Daily Journal DAR 8515; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18348; 2000 WL 1056057 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Adrian Salmon v. M. Carillo Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General

Opinion

ORDER

The order filed June 28, 2000 is amended as follows: In light of the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000), it is ORDERED that this case be remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing on Petitioner’s plea-related and appeal-related ineffectiveness of counsel claims. With this amendment, the petition for rehearing is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.