Adrian Salmon v. M. Carillo Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General
Adrian Salmon v. M. Carillo Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General
222 F.3d 1046; 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6433; 2000 Daily Journal DAR 8515; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18348; 2000 WL 1056057
(Federal Reporter, Third Series)
Adrian Salmon v. M. Carillo Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General
Opinion
ORDER
The order filed June 28, 2000 is amended as follows: In light of the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000), it is ORDERED that this case be remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing on Petitioner’s plea-related and appeal-related ineffectiveness of counsel claims. With this amendment, the petition for rehearing is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.