Forbes v. Napolitano
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge SCHROEDER; Concurrence by Judge SNEED
ORDER
Appellants have filed a petition for rehearing that pertains to one sentence of the court’s opinion. The sentence reads: “But where a statute criminalizes conduct, the law may not be impermissibly vague in any of its applications.” Forbes v. Napolitano, 236 F.3d 1009, 1011 (9th Cir. 2000). The petition for rehearing is GRANTED to the extent that the sentence in question is deleted, and the following substituted: “But where a statute criminalizes conduct, the law may be invalidated on vagueness grounds even if it could conceivably have some valid application.”
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Fred FORBES Margaret Bohn John L. Summers Ann S. Anderson, Stuart R. Snider George Melcher, Jr. Christopher Tisch Planned Parenthood of Central and Northern Arizona, Inc. Robert Tamis v. Janet NAPOLITANO, in her capacity as Attorney General, State of Arizona Stephen Neely, in his capacity as County Attorney, Pima County, Arizona
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published