Bryant v. Low

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit January 24, 2001

Bryant v. Low, 2 F. App'x 777 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM3

Ivan C. Bryant appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his action for lack of jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction *778pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Hexom v. Oregon Dep’t of Transp., 177 F.3d 1134, 1135 (9th Cir. 1999). We affirm.

Bryant’s complaint was properly dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on sovereign immunity. See Idaho v. Coeur d’Alene Tribe of Idaho, 521 U.S. 261, 268-69, 117 S.Ct. 2028, 138 L.Ed.2d 438 (1997).4

AFFIRMED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

. Bryant’s motions filed October 27, 2000 and Biyant’s request to take judicial notice filed September 26, 2000 are denied.

Reference

Full Case Name: Ivan C. BRYANT, Indenture Trustee for the Apache Indian Tribe, the Apache Tribe Federal Credit Union, the Apache Tribe International Bank, CAL-NOR, Cal Marine Industries ESOP & Trust, Zenith Insurance Limited, and Associates v. Harry W. LOW, Commissioner of Insurance, State of California Department of Insurance
Status: Published