Benoist v. Fast Draw Productions Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit February 21, 2001

Benoist v. Fast Draw Productions Inc., 3 F. App'x 640 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM2

Noel T. Benoist appeals pro se the order of the district court dismissing his action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to comply -with a prior order to proceed to contractual arbitration. Because the district court clearly intended its May 3, 1999 order to operate as a final adjudication, we have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See Nevada v. Burford, 918 F.2d 854, 855 (9th Cir. 1990). We review for abuse of discretion, see Al-Torki v. Kaempen, 78 F.3d 1381, 1384 (9th Cir. 1996), and *641affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its May 3,1999 order.

AFFIRMED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: Noel T. BENOIST v. FAST DRAW PRODUCTIONS INC. Tristar Productions Inc.
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published