Landmark Capital II, LLC v. Hameetman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit March 13, 2001

Landmark Capital II, LLC v. Hameetman, 5 F. App'x 751 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Limited partnership interests in the partnerships of Cal-American Income *752Property Funds III, IV, VI and VII do not constitute a cognizable relevant market under 15 U.S.C. § 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. See Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 124 F.3d 430, 436 (3d Cir. 1997); Kalmanovitz v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc., 576 F.Supp. 922, 927 (D.Del. 1983). Therefore, Landmark II has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts *752of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: LANDMARK CAPITAL II, LLC, a California limited liability company Roberta K. Lowery v. Fred HAMEETMAN Cal-American Property Fund III, a California limited partnership Cal-American Property Fund VI, a California limited partnership Cal-American Property VII, a California limited partnership Cal-American Property Fund IV, a California limited partnership
Status: Published