Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2001

Landmark Capital II, LLC v. Hameetman

Landmark Capital II, LLC v. Hameetman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 13, 2001 · Alarcón, Brunetti, Hawkins
5 F. App'x 751

Landmark Capital II, LLC v. Hameetman

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Limited partnership interests in the partnerships of Cal-American Income *752Property Funds III, IV, VI and VII do not constitute a cognizable relevant market under 15 U.S.C. § 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. See Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 124 F.3d 430, 436 (3d Cir. 1997); Kalmanovitz v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc., 576 F.Supp. 922, 927 (D.Del. 1983). Therefore, Landmark II has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts *752of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑