MEMORANDUM2

Mario Humberto Arreola-Trasvina appeals his 57-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea conviction for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Arreola-Trasvina contends that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence 16-levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 for a prior aggravated felony conviction which was not charged in the indictment or admitted at his plea but which increased his sentence above the applicable statutory maximum penalty, in violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. *5912348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Arreola-Trasvina’s contention is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir. 2000) (concluding that Apprendi preserves the rule in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), that prior convictions are sentencing factors). The district court therefore properly considered Arreola-Trasvina’s aggravated felony in sentencing him although it was not charged in the indictment or proved beyond a reasonable doubt. See Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d at 413-14; see also Apprendi, 120 S.Ct. at 2362.

AFFIRMED.