Cunningham v. Scharf

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit March 29, 2001

Cunningham v. Scharf, 6 F. App'x 648 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM2

Bradly Cunningham, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo and affirm. See Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 816 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam); see also Wash.Rev.Stat. § 4.24.470.

AFFIRMED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: Bradly M. CUNNINGHAM v. James SCHARF P. Skovold Mindy Richardson
Status: Published