Valentin v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Claudia Valentin (“Petitioner”) petitions for review of the final order of deportation entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) on September 1, 1999. Petitioner was served with an order to show cause (“OSC”) on December 1, 1995, approximately six years and two months after she entered the United States. At a hearing on March 19, 1997, the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denied Petitioner’s application for suspension of deportation because she had failed to meet the continuous physical presence requirement before being served with the OSC and thus was statutorily ineligible for suspension. On appeal, the BIA affirmed.
Petitioner contends that she was eligible for suspension of deportation and challenges the BIA’s decision that the “stop-time rule” — a new continuous physical presence requirement set forth in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”)— bars such relief in her case. Moreover, Petitioner contends that the IJ erroneously applied the stop-time rule to her case on March 19, 1997, nearly two weeks before IIRIRA’s effective date of April 1, 1997. We agree that the IJ erred in applying the stop-time rule to Petitioner’s case before IIRIRA became effective. Guadalupe-Cruz v. INS, 240 F.3d 1209 (9th Cir. 2001).
PETITION GRANTED; REVERSED and REMANDED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Claudia VALENTIN v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
- Status
- Published