MEMORANDUM **

Russell Vincent Wrenn appeals his conviction and sentence for possessing a firearm as a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He claims that the district court erred in granting the Government’s motion in limine to preclude evidence of a necessity defense. He also claims that the statute is unconstitutional as applied to him, because the Government failed to prove a sufficient nexus to interstate commerce. Finally, he claims that the district court erred by refusing to grant him an additional one-point reduction for timely providing the police with complete information concerning his involvement in the offense under U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(b)(l), after it found that he showed acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(a).

None of his assignments of error finds support in Ninth Circuit cases.

AFFIRMED.