MEMORANDUM *

Because Cross did not fully confess responsibility for her offense, the district court did not commit clear error when it determined that Cross was not entitled to a sentence adjustment for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. Nor did the court err by failing to *789state the reasons underlying the sentence as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c). The district court made a clear record when it adopted .the sentencing category set forth in the presentence report. United, States v. Upshaw, 918 F.2d 789, 792 (9th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED.