U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2001

United States v. Ortega-Ramirez

United States v. Ortega-Ramirez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 23, 2001 · Kozinski, Nelson, Tallman
15 F. App'x 480

United States v. Ortega-Ramirez

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Raudel Ortega-Ramirez appeals his sentence imposed after his guilty plea to being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Ortega-Ramirez contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court erred in imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) based upon a prior felony which he did not admit, and which was not submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt. He *481also contends that Apprendi renders inapplicable Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), because he did not admit to an aggravated felony at his plea hearing. His arguments are foreclosed by this court’s recent decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir. 2000).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.