United States v. Scott

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit November 13, 2001

United States v. Scott, 21 F. App'x 774 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Edgar Scott appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sentence for armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) & (d). Scott’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Scott did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Having conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude that there are no arguable appellate issues. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee v. Edgar Lamar SCOTT, Defendant—Appellant
Status: Published