David Dung Le, M.D., Inc. v. Commissioner
Cases that cite this one
67 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Matthew Eric Baham & Jennifer Michelle Baham v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 2017)
- NT, Inc. v. Comm'r (United States Tax Court 2006)
- Veleta Williams (United States Tax Court 2025)
- William J. Spain & Idovia A. Spain (United States Tax Court 2021)
- Timbron International Corporation v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 2019)
- Matthews v. Comm'r (United States Tax Court 2015)
- Biomage, LLC v. Comm'r (United States Tax Court 2013)
- Wise Guys Holdings, LLC v. Comm'r (United States Tax Court 2013)
- Henry and Susan F. Samueli v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 2009)
- NT, Inc. d.b.a. Natures Touch v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 2006)
- Urbano v. Comm'r (United States Tax Court 2004)
- Arbor Vita Corporation D.B.A. Hemediagnostics (United States Tax Court 2026)
- William Pratt (United States Tax Court 2026)
- Jordan John O'Neill (United States Tax Court 2025)
- Donna Davis (United States Tax Court 2025)
- Keith M. Phillips (United States Tax Court 2024)
- Xc Foundation v. Cir (9th Cir. 2024)
- J.E. Ryckman (United States Tax Court 2024)
- Mark F. Coble (United States Tax Court 2024)
- XC Foundation (United States Tax Court 2023)
- Techtron Holding, Inc. (United States Tax Court 2023)
- Nick A. Kolev (United States Tax Court 2023)
- James Mellon (United States Tax Court 2023)
- William H. Evenhouse & Nelle L. Evenhouse (United States Tax Court 2023)
- Don L. Rockafellor & Kathleen M. Rockafellor (United States Tax Court 2023)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
David Dung Le, M.D., Inc. appeals the dismissal of its petition in the Tax Court challenging an assessed tax deficiency. We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1) and we affirm for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Tax Court.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.