U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2001

Wepsic v. Bankers Trust Co. of California, N.A.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 14, 2001

23 F. App'x 694

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Dianne Mannion Wepsic appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal1 of her loan *695rescission action filed pursuant to the Truth-in-Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1635(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim, Stone v. Travelers Corp., 58 F.3d 434, 436-37 (9th Cir. 1995), and we affirm.

Because Wepsic failed to file her action within three years of the consummation of her loan, the district court properly dismissed her TILA claim seeking rescission of the loan. See 15 U.S.C. § 1635(f); Beach v. Ocwen Fed. Bank, 523 U.S. 410, 419, 118 S.Ct. 1408, 140 L.Ed.2d 566 (1998).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by not exercising supplemental jurisdiction over her state law claims because the court dismissed all claims over which it had original jurisdiction. See Executive Software N. Am., Inc. v. United States Dist. Court, 24 F.3d 1545, 1555-56 (9th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

. Wepsic does not challenge summary judgment for defendants on her claims for violations of an automatic bankruptcy stay and the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.