Rupinder Kaur Loveleen Kaur v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Albert Njie v. Eric Holder, Jr. (9th Cir. 2014)
- Keyla Perez-Quiroz v. Eric Holder, Jr. (9th Cir. 2013)
- Abramovich v. INS (6th Cir. 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion filed' January 24, 2001 is amended as follows:
1. At page 1154 of the slip opinion, in the middle of the paragraph that begins with the words “Second, the Kaurs made a showing”, delete the following two sentences:
In this case, the asylum officer’s adverse credibility finding was likely based on the resource materials that he consulted. Even though the IJ would have made an independent review of the asylum application, there was a high probability not only that the government would challenge the Kaurs’ credibility, but that the resource materials would be a cornerstone of the government’s effort to impeach their testimony.
2. Insert in place of the deleted sentences the following:
In this case, it would be reasonable to assume that the asylum officer used the resource materials which he consulted to arrive at his adverse credibility finding. Even though the IJ would have made an independent review of the asylum application, it would also be reasonable to *831 expect not only that the government would challenge the Kaurs’ credibility, but that the resource materials would be used by the government in its effort to impeach their testimony.
With the foregoing amendment, the Respondent INS’s petition for panel rehearing is denied.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.