Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 311 F.3d 1132 (9th Cir. 2002)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed September 20, 2002, is amended as follows:
Slip opinion at 14626 [306 F.3d 794], first full paragraph, line 16, delete “so we affirm the judgment as to them.”
With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Rymer voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judges Canby and Bertelsman so recommended.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, James Aikens James Francis Chris Wilson Shawn Hogya, Intervenors-Appellees v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellant Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and James Aikens James Francis Chris Wilson Shawn Hogya, Intervenors-Appellants v. United Parcel Service, Inc., Defendant-Appellee Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and James Aikens, Intervenor v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published