Kyocera Corp. v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit December 17, 2002

Kyocera Corp. v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., 314 F.3d 1003 (9th Cir. 2002)

2002 WL 31875348

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

. Judge Tashima was recused.

Reference

Full Case Name: KYOCERA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. PRUDENTIAL-BACHE TRADE SERVICES, INC., fdba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation, Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Lapine Technology Corporation, and Lapine Holding Company, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees Lapine Technology Corporation v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Appellant Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellee v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Prudential-Bache Trade Order Services, Inc., fdba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published