Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2002

Kyocera Corp. v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc.

Kyocera Corp. v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 17, 2002 · Schroeder
314 F.3d 1003; 2002 WL 31875348 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Kyocera Corp. v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

. Judge Tashima was recused.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑