Sandstrom v. Boeing Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Sandstrom v. Boeing Co., 31 F. App'x 347 (9th Cir. 2002)
Sandstrom v. Boeing Co.
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons succinctly set forth by the district court. The district court did not err in stating that Sandstrom had received the benefit of his bargain; his reinstatement was disputed, and was achieved as part of the settlement that incorporated the “Last Chance Memorandum.” We have re
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Dan SANDSTROM, aka Dan Skala, Plaintiff—Appellant v. BOEING COMPANY Lodge No 751 Aerospace Machinists Industrial District, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Published