Perry v. Bristol Meyer Squib

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit February 25, 2002

Perry v. Bristol Meyer Squib, 31 F. App'x 445 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Kevin L. Perry appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion, Allmerica Fin. Life Ins. & Annuity Co. v. Llewellyn, 139 F.3d 664, 665 (9th Cir. 1997), and we affirm because none of the applicable grounds for relief exists in this case, see Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993).

Perry’s additional contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: Kevin L. PERRY v. BRISTOL MEYER SQUIB, a public corporation
Status: Published