Richardson v. California
Richardson v. California
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Alfreda Richardson appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing her action without prejudice for failure to serve the summons and complaint upon
We affirm for the reasons stated in the March 30, 2001, report and recommendation of the magistrate judge, approved and adopted by the district court on May 2, 2001. Mason v. Genisco Tech. Corp., 960 F.2d 849, 852 (9th Cir. 1992); Townsel v. County of Contra Costa, 820 F.2d 319, 320 (9th Cir. 1987).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
. All pending motions are denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.