U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2002

Crisp v. Gourley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 20, 2002

32 F. App'x 382

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Matthew R. Crisp appeals pro se the district court’s decision to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim for relief. Because Crisp filed his notice of appeal one day late, we lack jurisdiction. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1) (2001).

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.