U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2002

Harrison v. Scottsdale Insurance

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 6, 2002

34 F. App'x 362

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Because the underlying complaint did not allege bodily injury or property damage within the meaning of the Harrison’s commercial general liability policy, we affirm. See Waller v. Truck Ins. Exch., Inc., 11 Cal.4th 1, 44 Cal.Rptr.2d 370, 900 P.2d 619, 630 (1995). Scottsdale’s motion for sanctions is denied.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.