ORDER

Because the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument, see United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam), we grant appellee’s motion for summary affirmance, see Brewster v. Shasta County, 275 F.3d 803 (9th Cir. 2001); Navarro v. Block, 250 F.3d 729 (9th Cir. 2001).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.