MEMORANDUM**

Norman Gotcher, Jr., a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional violations in connection with his placement in administrative segregation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Barnett v. Centoni 31 F.3d 813, 816 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam), and affirm.

Because Gotcher does not have a liberty interest in avoiding placement in administrative segregation, the district court prop*628erly dismissed his due process claims with prejudice. See May v. Baldwin, 109 F.3d 557, 565 (9th Cir. 1997). Moreover, because Gotcher was disciplined with the revocation of good-time credits and did not demonstrate that this discipline had been vitiated by a state-court proceeding, the district court properly dismissed these claims. See Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 646-47, 117 S.Ct. 1584, 137 L.Ed.2d 906 (1997).

We also affirm the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of Gotcher’s access-to-the-courts claims. See Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 354-55, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996).

Finally, because Gotcher admitted in his objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation that he had not exhausted his claims regarding his inmate trust account, we conclude that the district court properly dismissed these claims without prejudice. See Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 741, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001).

We reject Gotcher’s remaining contentions on appeal.

AFFIRMED,