MEMORANDUM***

Er Tai He, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applica*319tions for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Where the BIA’s decision incorporates the IJ’s, we review the IJ’s decision. Gui v. INS, 280 F.3d 1217, 1225 (9th Cir. 2002). The IJ must give “a legitimate articulable basis to question the petitioner’s credibility and ... a specific, cogent reason for any stated disbelief.” Id.

The IJ’s adverse credibility finding was supported by substantial evidence. The IJ pointed to the implausibility of He’s story and the contradictions between He’s testimony and the country conditions reports in making the adverse credibility finding. Absent credible evidence, He’s asylum application must fail. See Berroteran-Melendez v. INS, 955 F.2d 1251, 1256-58 (9th Cir. 1992).

In failing to qualify for asylum, He necessarily failed to satisfy the more stringent standard for -withholding of removal. See Chen v. INS, 266 F.3d 1094, 1099 (9thCir. 2001).

We do not address He’s Convention Against Torture claim because he did not raise it in his opening brief. See United States v. Ullah, 976 F.2d 509, 514 (9thCir. 1992).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.