U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2002

United States v. Trinidad-Castro

United States v. Trinidad-Castro
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 19, 2002
38 F. App'x 472

United States v. Trinidad-Castro

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Jose Trinidad-Castro appeals his conviction by guilty plea to one count of importation of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. Trinidad-Castro’s contention that the indictment should be dismissed because Sections 952 and 960 are unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is foreclosed by United States v. Mendoza-Paz, 286 F.3d 1104, 1109-1111 (9th Cir. 2002) (Section 960), and United States v. Varela-Rivera, 279 F.3d 1174, 1175 n. 1 (9th Cir. 2002) (Section 952). His contention that the indictment should be dismissed because it did not allege mens rea as to drug type and quantity is foreclosed by United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634, -, - - -, slip op. 6531, 6546-47 (9th Cir. 2002).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.