U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2002

United States v. Soto-Navarro

United States v. Soto-Navarro
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 16, 2002
44 F. App'x 268

United States v. Soto-Navarro

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Jesus Soto-Navarro appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sentence for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.

Soto-Navarro’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Soto-Navarro has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that the plea agreement, including the waiver of the right to appeal, was entered knowingly and voluntarily, United States v. Aguilar-Muniz, 156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir. 1998), we enforce the waiver, grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and dismiss the appeal.

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.