United States v. Ramirez
United States v. Ramirez
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Jorge Ramirez appeals his conviction by guilty plea for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. Ramirez’s argument that his convictions should be reversed because 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960 are unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is foreclosed by United States v. Varela-Rivera, 279 F.3d 1174, 1175 n. 1 (9th Cir. 2002) (section 952) and United States v. Mendoza-Paz, 286 F.3d 1104, 1109-11 (9th Cir. 2002) (section 960).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.