MEMORANDUM**

Naira Valían petitions to review the BIA’s denial of her application for asylum and withholding of removal. The record reflects that the IJ doubted her claim of membership in the persecuted Baha’i faith because she could not provide corroboration of such membership.

Absent a clear and supported finding of lack of credibility, her testimony that she had been beaten, nearly raped, and otherwise tortured because of her Baha’i faith must be accepted. Kataria v. INS, 232 F.3d 1107, 1113 (9th Cir. 2000). The IJ at the hearing, did not give her any express indication that he had doubts about her credibility, and never told her what kind of corroboration she might bring in to satisfy his concerns.

The IJ has a duty to conduct a fair hearing, Hartooni v. INS, 21 F.3d 336, 339-40 (9th Cir. 1994), and to develop the record where there may be doubts of the accuracy or truth of matters presented. Aguilera-Cota v. INS, 914 F.2d 1375, 1381 (9th Cir. 1990). On the basis of the record before us, we must, accept as compelling the petitioner’s testimony concerning past persecution on account of religion. See Kataria, 232 F.3d at 1113-14. There was no adequate rebuttal by the government. She has thus satisfied her burden of showing probability of persecution in the future.

The petition for review is GRANTED and the matter REMANDED to the Board to order withdrawing of removal and to determine whether to grant asylum.