Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2002

Trunnels v. Schmidt

Trunnels v. Schmidt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 15, 2002 · Nelson, Thomas, Trott
50 F. App'x 886

Trunnels v. Schmidt

Opinion of the Court

ORDER *

The judgment of the bankruptcy appellate panel is AFFIRMED for the reasons *887set forth in the memorandum disposition of the bankruptcy appellate panel filed on July 9, 2001. Because the parties failed to submit excerpts of the adversary proceeding to the bankruptcy appellate panel, it was unable to determine whether the factual findings of the bankruptcy court were clearly erroneous. We have reviewed the entire transcript of the adversary proceeding, and we conclude that the bankruptcy court did not clearly err1 in its factual findings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

This order is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of *887this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

. Peklar v. Ikerd (In re Peklar), 260 F.3d 1035, 1037 (9th Cir. 2001).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑