United States v. Medina-Mendoza

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit November 22, 2002

United States v. Medina-Mendoza, 51 F. App'x 201 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Julio Medina-Mendoza appeals from his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry *202in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Medina-Mendoza’s counsel has filed a motion pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating there are no arguable issues for review and seeking to withdraw as counsel of record. Mendoza has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee v. Julio MEDINA-MENDOZA, Defendant—Appellant
Status: Published