United States v. Mendoza-Valles
United States v. Mendoza-Valles
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Jose Mendoza-Valles appeals his 70-month sentence imposed following a
DISCUSSION
The Government did not challenge the district court’s authority to depart on either basis asserted by Mendoza-Valles, and the district court did not state a belief that it lacked discretion to do so. In fact, the court’s statements at sentencing indicate clearly that it was aware of its discretion and that it chose not to make a departure given the seriousness of the defendant’s criminal history and the fact that he re-entered this country just one month after his deportation. Accordingly, we cannot conclude that the district court determined that it lacked authority to depart downward on the bases asserted by the defendant. Because we lack jurisdiction to review a district court’s discretionary decision not to depart downward from the applicable Sentencing Guideline, see United States v. Romero, 293 F.3d 1120, 1126 (9th Cir. 2002), we dismiss the appeal.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee v. Jesus Jose MENDOZA-VALLES, aka Ireneo Monseigneur-Silero, aka Ireneo Silero-Monseigneur, Defendant—Appellant
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published