MEMORANDUM***

Defendants’ convictions for conspiring to possess, with intent to distribute, 500 grams or more of cocaine-a lesser included offense of the crime charged in Count I, see Schmuck, v. United States, 489 U.S. 705, 715-16, 109 S.Ct. 1443, 103 L.Ed.2d 734 (1989)-were proper predicates for the substantive offense charged in Counts III and IV. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (punishing “any person who, during and in relation to any ... drug trafficking crime ..., uses or carries a firearm, or who, in furtherance of any such crime, possesses a firearm”). There was thus no error, much less plain error. See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 734, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993).

21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B) is not facially unconstitutional. See United States v. Buckland, 277 F.3d 1173, 1177 (9th Cir. 2002) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.