Nicholson v. Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit November 27, 2002

Nicholson v. Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc., 51 F. App'x 750 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Arvilla M. Nicholson appeals pro se the jury verdict in favor of her former employer in her employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We dismiss the appeal.

We are unable to review Nicholson’s contentions that defense counsel introduced irrelevant and prejudicial evidence during trial, and made prejudicial remarks during closing argument because Nicholson has failed to provide a trial transcript. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2); see also Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169 (9th Cir. 1991) (per curiam) (holding that the court may dismiss appeal or refuse to consider appellant’s contentions when appellant fails to supply a trial transcript).

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: Arvilla M. NICHOLSON v. CON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, fka Con-Way Western Express
Status: Published