U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2002

United States v. Batista

United States v. Batista
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 9, 2002 · Goodwin, Graber, Trott
52 F. App'x 86

United States v. Batista

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Joseph Batista appeals his conviction and 28-month sentence imposed after his jury trial for bank fraud and possession of stolen mail, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344,1708.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Batista has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Batista has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.