Kyocera Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Prudential-Bache...

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit December 17, 2002

Kyocera Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Prudential-Bache..., 314 F.3d 1003 (9th Cir. 2002)

2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 12044; 2002 Daily Journal DAR 14172; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 25888

Opinion

KYOCERA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
PRUDENTIAL-BACHE TRADE SERVICES, INC., fdba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation, Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Lapine Technology Corporation, and Lapine Holding Company, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees.
Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.
Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellee,
v.
Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Prudential-Bache Trade Order Services, Inc., fdba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation; Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees.

No. 01-15630.

No. 01-15653.

No. 01-16182.

No. 01-16394.

No. 01-16528.

No. 01-16392.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed December 17, 2002.

Angela L. Padilla, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Shirley M. Hufstedler, Esq., Morrison & Foerster, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant.

Charles S. Treat, Paul H. Dawes, Latham & Watkins, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Notes:

Judge Tashima was recused

Reference

Full Case Name: Kyocera Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Fdba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation, Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Lapine Technology Corporation, and Lapine Holding Company, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. Lapine Technology Corporation v. Kyocera Corporation, Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellee v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Prudential-Bache Trade Order Services, Inc., Fdba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees
Status: Published